The efficacy and safety of fingolimod plus standardized treatment versus
standardized treatment alone for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic
review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Aims Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the most common type of stroke.
Fingolimod is a sphingosine analog that acts on sphingosine-1-phosphate
receptors(S1PR). Recently, the safety and efficacy of fingolimod in both
patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and patients with AIS have been
investigated in proof-of-concept trials. In this review, we performed a
meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fingolimod for AIS.
Methods This study was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred
Reporting Items for Systemic review and Meta-Analysis) statement. We
searched for publications on the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central
Register of Controlled Trials, Clinical trials, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP,
CBM up to August 2021. We compiled 5 studies; a main Meta-analysis
forest plots were conducted for the values of the proportion of patients
whose modified Rankin scale(MRS) score was 0-1 at day 90. A sensitivity
analysis was performed with a mean difference (MD) of the efficacy of
fingolimod plus standardized treatment versus standardized treatment
alone. Random effect karyotype is used for Meta-analysis regardless of
the I2 index. The methodological quality of each randomized controlled
trial (RCTs) was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration tool
to assess the risk of bias (ROB). Results A meta-analysis of 5 studies
with 228 participants was conducted. The risk ratio of patients whose
MRS score was 0-1 at day 90 between fingolimod plus standardized
treatment and standardized treatment alone was 2.59. Conclusions The
Fingolimod plus standard treatment group resulted in more ischemic
penumbra rescue and improved clinical function than the standard
treatment.