loading page

The efficacy and safety of fingolimod plus standardized treatment versus standardized treatment alone for acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  • +10
  • Peng Bai,
  • Runxiu Zhu,
  • Ping Wang,
  • Feng Jiang,
  • Jin Zhen,
  • Yuan Yao,
  • Chenhui Zhao,
  • Zihong Liang,
  • Meiling Wang,
  • Bin Liu,
  • Min Li,
  • Na Li,
  • Jun Yuan
Peng Bai
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Runxiu Zhu
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital
Author Profile
Ping Wang
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital
Author Profile
Feng Jiang
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital
Author Profile
Jin Zhen
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital
Author Profile
Yuan Yao
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital
Author Profile
Chenhui Zhao
The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College
Author Profile
Zihong Liang
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital
Author Profile
Meiling Wang
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital
Author Profile
Bin Liu
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital
Author Profile
Min Li
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital
Author Profile
Na Li
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital
Author Profile
Jun Yuan
Inner Mongolia People's Hospital
Author Profile

Abstract

Aims Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is the most common type of stroke. Fingolimod is a sphingosine analog that acts on sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors(S1PR). Recently, the safety and efficacy of fingolimod in both patients with intracerebral hemorrhage and patients with AIS have been investigated in proof-of-concept trials. In this review, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fingolimod for AIS. Methods This study was conducted according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic review and Meta-Analysis) statement. We searched for publications on the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinical trials, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, CBM up to August 2021. We compiled 5 studies; a main Meta-analysis forest plots were conducted for the values of the proportion of patients whose modified Rankin scale(MRS) score was 0-1 at day 90. A sensitivity analysis was performed with a mean difference (MD) of the efficacy of fingolimod plus standardized treatment versus standardized treatment alone. Random effect karyotype is used for Meta-analysis regardless of the I2 index. The methodological quality of each randomized controlled trial (RCTs) was assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration tool to assess the risk of bias (ROB). Results A meta-analysis of 5 studies with 228 participants was conducted. The risk ratio of patients whose MRS score was 0-1 at day 90 between fingolimod plus standardized treatment and standardized treatment alone was 2.59. Conclusions The Fingolimod plus standard treatment group resulted in more ischemic penumbra rescue and improved clinical function than the standard treatment.