Figure legends
Fig. 1 COL13 RNA accumulates at high levels in the hypocotyl.(a) Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of AtCOL13 transcript abundance
in different tissues. R, Root; S, Stem; L, Leaf; SAM, Shoot apical
meristem; H, Hypocotyl; F, Flower. (b) Activity of the COL13 promoter
revealed by β-glucuronidase (GUS) staining in Arabidopsisseedlings. Bar = 100 mm.
Fig. 2 COL13 regulates hypocotyl elongation under red-light
conditions. (a) Relative expression of COL13 in Col-0 and
overexpression (OX) lines. (b) Relative expression of COL13 in Col-0,
T-DNA mutant (col13), and RNAi lines (R1-1 and others). (c)-(e)
Phenotypic analysis of seedlings of the indicated genotypes were grown
in the presence of red light. Images of representative seedlings are
shown in (c). The hypocotyl lengths of the indicated genotypes were
measured and are shown in (d) and (e). Error bars indicate the standard
deviations (n >15). Asterisks indicate that hypocotyl
lengths in OX9 and col13, COL13 RNAi are significantly different than
that of the WT under red light (P < 0.05).
Fig. 3 Genetic interaction and physiological characterization of
hypocotyl elongation (a) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR analyses of COL13
expression in phyB , col3 , hy5, and cop1 mutants.
(b) qRT-PCR analyses of COL13 expression in phyB , col3 ,hy5, and cop1 mutants. (c) Activity of the COL13 promoter
revealed by β-glucuronidase (GUS) staining in WT and col3 mutant
backgrounds. (d) Hypocotyl length in WT and single- and double-mutant
plants. (e) Hypocotyl length in WT and col3 plants compared to
transgenic plants with COL13 RNAi or COL13 overexpression (OX) in the
col3 background. Error bars indicate the standard deviations
(n >15). Lower-case letters indicate significantly
different data groups (hypocotyl length) for the indicated seedlings
grown under red light.
Fig. 4 Analysis of the binding of HY5 to the COL3 promoter and
COL3 to COL13 promoter truncations. (a) Diagram of the constructs used.
The AD-HY5 or AD-COL3 fusion gene driven by the 35S promoter produces a
potential effector protein, whereas the AD protein alone represents a
negative control for the basal activity of the COL3 promoter or each
COL13 promoter truncation. The LUC gene driven by the series of COL3
promoter or COL13 promoter truncations tests the ability of the AD-HY5
or AD-COL3 fusion protein to bind to each promoter truncation. (b) The
fusion protein AD-HY5, but not AD alone, can affect LUC expression from
the COL3 promoter truncations, and the fusion protein AD-COL3, but not
AD alone, can affect LUC expression from some of the COL13 promoter
truncations. (c) Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) analysis
showing the binding of COL3 to COL13 at -1421 to -1184 bp promoter
(probe 2) in vitro . The black arrow indicates the binding of COL3
to the biotin-labeled COL13 promoter. The + and – represent the
presence and absence of the corresponding components, respectively.
Fig. 5 Subcellular localization of COL13 (a) COL13-CFP
localizes to the nucleus in protoplasts. (d) COL13-GFP localizes to the
nucleus in root tip cells.
Fig. 6 COL13 interacts with COL3. (a) Yeast two-hybrid assay
between COL13 and COL3. DDO, double dropout; QDO, quadruple dropout;
pGADT7, prey plasmid; pGBKT7, bait plasmid. (b) Co-immunoprecipitation
(Co-IP) in Arabidopsis Immunoprecipitations (IPs) were performed
on proteins extracted from 10 d-old Arabidopsis seedlings grown
under long-day illumination (16L: 8D) at 22 °C. Leaf tissues were
harvested 1 h after the light cycle commenced. IP was performed using an
anti-HA antibody and COL13 was co-immunoprecipitated with an anti-GFP
antibody. A 5% input was used. Western blots were performed on 10%
(wt/vol) precast gels (Bio-Rad). (c) COL3-CFP and COL13-YFP colocalize
to the nucleus in protoplasts in the light and dark. (d-f) FRET between
CFP-COL3 and YFP-COL13 analyzed by acceptor bleaching in the nucleus.
The top panels in (d) show a representative pre-bleach nucleus
co-expressing YFP-COL13 and CFP-COL3 excited with either a 514 or a 405
nm laser in light and dark, resulting in emission from YFP (yellow) or
CFP (blue), respectively. The bottom panels in (d) show the same nucleus
post-bleaching after excitation with a 514 or a 405 nm laser. The
relative intensities of both YFP and CFP were measured before and after
bleaching, as indicated in (e) and (f), respectively.
Fig. 7 COL13 promotes the interaction between COL3 and COP1.(a) Yeast three-hybrid analysis of COP1-COL3 interaction in the presence
of COL13. Normalized Miller units were calculated as a ratio of
α-galactosidase activity in yeast. Additionally, normalized Miller units
are reported separately for yeast grown on media with or without 1 mM
methionine (Met), corresponding to induction (-Met) or repression (+Met)
of Met25 promoter-driven COL13 expression, respectively. Means and
standard errors of the means for three biological repetitions are shown.
Lower-case letters indicate significant differences in α-galactosidase.
(b) A model representing the HY5-COL3-COL13 regulatory chain and
COP1-dependent COL3-COL13 feedback pathway in the regulation of
hypocotyl elongation.