Funding
Funding for the study was supported by SingHealth Duke-NUS OBGYN
Academic Clinical Program (ACP) Grant.
References:
Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita AT, Silver RM, Mallet G et al. Labor
induction versus expectant management for low-risk nulliparous
women. New England Journal of Medicine2018; DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566
Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, Mol BW, Irion O, Boulvain M.
Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2012 Mar 14;3.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Insertion
of a double balloon catheter for induction of labour in pregnant women
without previous caesarean section: Interventional procedures guidance.
London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2015.
Lim SE, Tan TL, Ng GYH, Tagore S, Kyaw EEP, Yeo GSH. Patient
satisfaction with the cervical ripening balloon as a method for
induction of labour: a randomised controlled trial. Singapore Med J.
2018;59(8):419–424. doi:10.11622/smedj.201809.
Løkkegaard E1, Lundstrøm M, Kjær MM, Christensen IJ, Pedersen HB, Nyholm
H. Prospective multi-centre randomised trial comparing induction of
labour with a double-balloon catheter versus dinoprostone. J Obstet
Gynaecol. 2015 Feb 18:1-6.
Wilkinson C, Bryce R, Adelson P, Turnbull D.A randomised controlled
trial of outpatient compared with inpatient cervical ripening with
prostaglandin E₂ (OPRA study). BJOG. 2015 Jan;122(1):94-104.
Howard K, Gerard K, Adelson P, Bryce R, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D. Women’s
preferences for inpatient and outpatient priming for labour induction: a
discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jul 30;14:330.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-330.
Wilkinson C, Bryce R, Adelson P, Turnbull D. A comparison of inpatient
and outpatient balloon catheter cervical ripening pilot randomised
controlled trial. BMC 2015:15;126.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Induction
of labor: clinical guideline no. 70. London: National Institute for
Clinical Excellence; 2008.
Egarter CH, Husslein PW, Rayburn WF. Uterine hyperstimulation after
low-dose prostaglandin E2 therapy: tocolytic treatment in 181 cases.
ACOG 1990:163(3):794-79.
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE).
Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies: clinical guideline no.
190. London: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2014
Du YM, Zhu LY, Cui LN, Jin BH, Ou JL. Double-balloon catheter versus
prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a
systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
BJOG 2016; DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14256. Epub 2016 Aug 17
Diederen M, Gommers J, Wilkinson C, Turnbull D, Mol B. Safety of the
balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications
during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in
the process of labour induction: a systematic review.
BJOG. 2018
Aug;125(9):1086-1095. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15047. Epub 2018 Jan 10
Solt I, Wolf MF, Ben-Haroush S, Kaminskyi S, Ophir E, Bornstein J. Foley
catheter versus cervical double balloon for labor induction: a
prospective randomized study, J Matern Fetal Neonatal Medicine. 2019;
11:1-8
Salim
R, Zafran
N, Nachum
Z, Garmi
G, Kraiem
N, Shalev
E. Single-balloon compared with double balloon catheters for induction
of labor: a randomized controlled trial
Obstet
Gynecol. 2011 Jul;118(1):79-86
Mei-Dan E, Walfisch A, Suarez-Easton S, Hallak M. Comparison of two
mechanical devices for cervical ripening: a prospective quasi-randomized
trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 25:6, 723-727.
Pennell C, Henderson J, O’Neill M, McCleery S, Doherty D. Induction of
labour in nulliparous women with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised
controlled trial comparing double and single balloon catheters and PGE2
gel. BJOG 2009;116:1443-1452.
Kehl S, Ziegler J, Schleussner E, Tuschy B, Berlit S, Kirscht J et al.
Sequential use of double-balloon catheter and oral misoprostol versus
oral misoprostol alone for induction of labour at term (CRBplus trial):
a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. BJOG
2015;122(1):129-136.
Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Uccella S, Agosti M, Serati M, Marchitelli G et al. A
randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: dinoprostone vaginal
insert versus double-balloon catheter. ACOG 2012;207:125-127
Atad J, Hallak M, Auslender R, Porat-Packer T, Zarfati D, Abramovici H.
A randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2, oxytocin, and the
double-balloon device in inducing labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:
223-227