References
1. Evers JL. Female subfertility. Lancet . 2002;360(9327):151-159.
2. Kocourkova J, Burcin B, Kucera T. Demographic relevancy of increased
use of assisted reproduction in european countries. Reprod
Health . 2014;11:37-4755-11-37.
3. De Geyter C, Calhaz-Jorge C, Kupka MS, et al. ART in europe, 2014:
Results generated from european registries by ESHRE: The european
IVF-monitoring consortium (EIM) for the european society of human
reproduction and embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod .
2018;33(9):1586-1601.
4. Hornstein MD. State of the ART: Assisted reproductive technologies in
the united states. Reprod Sci . 2016;23(12):1630-1633.
5. Bashiri A, Halper KI, Orvieto R. Recurrent implantation
failure-update overview on etiology, diagnosis, treatment and future
directions. Reprod Biol Endocrinol . 2018;16(1):121-018-0414-2.
6. Garrido N, Bellver J, Remohi J, Simon C, Pellicer A. Cumulative
live-birth rates per total number of embryos needed to reach newborn in
consecutive in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles: A new approach to
measuring the likelihood of IVF success. Fertil Steril .
2011;96(1):40-46.
7. Garrido N, Bellver J, Remohi J, Alama P, Pellicer A. Cumulative
newborn rates increase with the total number of transferred embryos
according to an analysis of 15,792 ovum donation cycles. Fertil
Steril . 2012;98(2):341-6.e1-2.
8. Cha J, Sun X, Dey SK. Mechanisms of implantation: Strategies for
successful pregnancy. Nat Med . 2012;18(12):1754-1767.
9. Coughlan C, Ledger W, Wang Q, et al. Recurrent implantation failure:
Definition and management. Reprod Biomed Online .
2014;28(1):14-38.
10. Zeyneloglu HB, Onalan G. Remedies for recurrent implantation
failure. Semin Reprod Med . 2014;32(4):297-305.
11. Rinehart J. Recurrent implantation failure: Definition. J
Assist Reprod Genet . 2007;24(7):284-287.
12. Simon A, Laufer N. Assessment and treatment of repeated implantation
failure (RIF). J Assist Reprod Genet . 2012;29(11):1227-1239.
13. Lessey BA, Castelbaum AJ, Sawin SW, Sun J. Integrins as markers of
uterine receptivity in women with primary unexplained infertility.Fertil Steril . 1995;63(3):535-542.
14. Bassil R, Casper R, Samara N, et al. Does the endometrial
receptivity array really provide personalized embryo transfer? J
Assist Reprod Genet . 2018;35(7):1301-1305.
15. Kliman HJ, Frankfurter D. Clinical approach to recurrent
implantation failure: Evidence-based evaluation of the endometrium.Fertil Steril . 2019;111(4):618-628.
16. Noyes RW, Hertig AT, Rock J. Dating the endometrial biopsy. Am
J Obstet Gynecol . 1975;122(2):262-263.
17. Coutifaris C, Myers ER, Guzick DS, et al. Histological dating of
timed endometrial biopsy tissue is not related to fertility status.Fertil Steril . 2004;82(5):1264-1272.
18. Murray MJ, Meyer WR, Zaino RJ, et al. A critical analysis of the
accuracy, reproducibility, and clinical utility of histologic
endometrial dating in fertile women. Fertil Steril .
2004;81(5):1333-1343.
19. Diaz-Gimeno P, Horcajadas JA, Martinez-Conejero JA, et al. A genomic
diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the
transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril . 2011;95(1):50-60,
60.e1-15.
20. Diaz-Gimeno P, Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, et al. The accuracy and
reproducibility of the endometrial receptivity array is superior to
histology as a diagnostic method for endometrial receptivity.Fertil Steril . 2013;99(2):508-517.
21. Diaz-Gimeno P, Ruiz-Alonso M, Sebastian-Leon P, Pellicer A, Valbuena
D, Simon C. Window of implantation transcriptomic stratification reveals
different endometrial subsignatures associated with live birth and
biochemical pregnancy. Fertil Steril . 2017;108(4):703-710.e3.
22. Ruiz-Alonso M, Galindo N, Pellicer A, Simon C. What a difference two
days make: ”Personalized” embryo transfer (pET) paradigm: A case report
and pilot study. Hum Reprod . 2014;29(6):1244-1247.
23. Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Diaz-Gimeno P, et al. The endometrial
receptivity array for diagnosis and personalized embryo transfer as a
treatment for patients with repeated implantation failure. Fertil
Steril . 2013;100(3):818-824.
24. Koot YE, van Hooff SR, Boomsma CM, et al. An endometrial gene
expression signature accurately predicts recurrent implantation failure
after IVF. Sci Rep . 2016;6:19411.
25. Macklon N. Recurrent implantation failure is a pathology with a
specific transcriptomic signature. Fertil Steril .
2017;108(1):9-14.
26. Valdes CT, Schutt A, Simon C. Implantation failure of endometrial
origin: It is not pathology, but our failure to synchronize the
developing embryo with a receptive endometrium. Fertil Steril .
2017;108(1):15-18.
27. Sebastian-Leon P, Garrido N, Remohi J, Pellicer A, Diaz-Gimeno P.
Asynchronous and pathological windows of implantation: Two causes of
recurrent implantation failure. Hum Reprod . 2018;33(4):626-635.
28. Coughlan C. What to do when good-quality embryos repeatedly fail to
implant. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol . 2018;53:48-59.
29. Nagaoka SI, Hassold TJ, Hunt PA. Human aneuploidy: Mechanisms and
new insights into an age-old problem. Nat Rev Genet .
2012;13(7):493-504.
30. Rubio C, Bellver J, Rodrigo L, et al. Preimplantation genetic
screening using fluorescence in situ hybridization in patients with
repetitive implantation failure and advanced maternal age: Two
randomized trials. Fertil Steril . 2013;99(5):1400-1407.
31. Hatirnaz S, Ozer A, Hatirnaz E, et al. Pre-implantation genetic
screening among women experiencing recurrent failure of in vitro
fertilization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet . 2017;137(3):314-318.
32. Cutting R, Morroll D, Roberts SA, Pickering S, Rutherford A, BFS and
ACE. Elective single embryo transfer: Guidelines for practice british
fertility society and association of clinical embryologists. Hum
Fertil (Camb) . 2008;11(3):131-146.
33. Garrido-Gomez T, Ruiz-Alonso M, Blesa D, Diaz-Gimeno P, Vilella F,
Simon C. Profiling the gene signature of endometrial receptivity:
Clinical results. Fertil Steril . 2013;99(4):1078-1085.
34. Blesa D, Ruiz-Alonso M, Simon C. Clinical management of endometrial
receptivity. Semin Reprod Med . 2014;32(5):410-413.
35. Rubio C, Rodrigo L, Mir P, et al. Use of array comparative genomic
hybridization (array-CGH) for embryo assessment: Clinical results.Fertil Steril . 2013;99(4):1044-1048.
36. R core team (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical
computing. R foundation for statistical computing, vienna, austria. URLhttp://Www.R-project.org/. In:
.
37. Raziel A, Friedler S, Schachter M, Kasterstein E, Strassburger D,
Ron-El R. Increased frequency of female partner chromosomal
abnormalities in patients with high-order implantation failure after in
vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril . 2002;78(3):515-519.
38. Stern C, Pertile M, Norris H, Hale L, Baker HW. Chromosome
translocations in couples with in-vitro fertilization implantation
failure. Hum Reprod . 1999;14(8):2097-2101.
39. Dahdouh EM, Balayla J, Garcia-Velasco JA. Impact of blastocyst
biopsy and comprehensive chromosome screening technology on
preimplantation genetic screening: A systematic review of randomized
controlled trials. Reprod Biomed Online . 2015;30(3):281-289.
40. Forman EJ, Hong KH, Ferry KM, et al. In vitro fertilization with
single euploid blastocyst transfer: A randomized controlled trial.Fertil Steril . 2013;100(1):100-7.e1.
41. Harton GL, Munne S, Surrey M, et al. Diminished effect of maternal
age on implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array
comparative genomic hybridization. Fertil Steril .
2013;100(6):1695-1703.
42. Fox C, Morin S, Jeong JW, Scott RT,Jr, Lessey BA. Local and systemic
factors and implantation: What is the evidence? Fertil Steril .
2016;105(4):873-884.
43. Tan J, Kan A, Hitkari J, et al. The role of the endometrial
receptivity array (ERA) in patients who have failed euploid embryo
transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet . 2018;35(4):683-692.
44. Munne S. Status of preimplantation genetic testing and embryo
selection. Reprod Biomed Online . 2018;37(4):393-396.
45. Munne S, Kaplan B, Frattarelli JL, et al. Preimplantation genetic
testing for aneuploidy versus morphology as selection criteria for
single frozen-thawed embryo transfer in good-prognosis patients: A
multicenter randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril .
2019;112(6):1071-1079.e7.
46. Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive
Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
Electronic address: ASRM@asrm.org, Practice Committees of the American
Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted
Reproductive Technology. The use of preimplantation genetic testing for
aneuploidy (PGT-A): A committee opinion. Fertil Steril .
2018;109(3):429-436.
47. Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozawa F, et al. Preimplantation genetic
testing for aneuploidy: A comparison of live birth rates in patients
with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent
implantation failure. Hum Reprod . 2019.
48. Das M, Holzer HE. Recurrent implantation failure: Gamete and embryo
factors. Fertil Steril . 2012;97(5):1021-1027.