REFERENCES
  1. Malvindi P, Mastro F, Kowalewski M et al. Durability of Mitral Valve Bioprostheses: A Meta-Analysis of Long-Term Follow-up Studies.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109(2):603‐611.
  2. Grunkemeier G, Furnary A, Wu Y, Wang L, Starr A. Durability of pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic heart valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;144(6):1381-6.
  3. Pomar L, Bosch X, Chaitman B, Pelletier C, Grondin C. Late Tears in Leaflets of Porcine Bioprostheses in Adults. Ann Thorac Surg 1983;37(1):78-83.
  4. Gao, G., Wu, Y., Grunkemeier, G.L., Furnary, A.P., and Starr, A. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves. J Am Coll Cardiol . 2004; 44: 384–388.
  5. Cipriano P, Billingham M, Oyer P, et al: Calcification of porcine prosthetic heart valves: a radiographic and light microscopic study.Circulation 66:1100, 1982.
  6. Miura T, Hazama S, Iwasaki K, Izumi K, Matsukuma S, Eishi K. A Rapid Structural Degeneration of a Porcine Mitral Valve. Ann Thorac Surg 2012;93:e113–4.
  7. Ha JW, Chang BC, Chung N, Cho SH. Images in cardiology. Acute severe mitral regurgitation due to unusual detachment of bioprosthetic valve leaflet. Clin Cardiol . 2000;23(3):213.
  8. Alexiou C, Langley SM, Stafford H, Lowes AJ, Livesey SA, Monro JL. Surgery for active culture-positive endocarditis: Determinants of early and late outcome. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2000;69:1448-1454
  9. Koziarz A, Makhdoum A, Butany J, Ouzounian M, Chung J. Modes of bioprosthetic valve failure: a narrative review. Current Opinion in Cardiology. 2020 Mar;35(2):123-132.