3.1.3. Proline Contents
The results regarding proline content revealed that mean proline content under 100% FC 0.828 were observed. Similarly under drought stress condition 80% FC the mean value for proline content 1.433 was recorded. Likewise in drought stress 60% the mean value for proline content 2.509 was recorded shown in (Table1 and Fig 3.). The results indicate that proline content was increased under drought stress condition as compared to control condition. As drought condition were increased the proline content were also increased. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) regarding proline content revealed that the effect of drought stress and response the genotypes were highly significant and the interaction of genotypes and different level of drought stress were also highly significant as shown in (Table 2). The least significant difference (LSD) regarding proline content showed that in 100% FC the proline content are not significantly different and maximum proline content 0.872 were recorded for genotype SD-28 followed by SD-32 wheat genotype. Similarly under drought stress 80% FC the maximum proline content 1.667 was recorded for stay green chirya-1 genotype followed by SD-32. Similarly in drought stress 60% FC the maximum proline content 3.091 was recorded for Opata genotype followed by stay green chirya-1 genotype as shown in (Table 3). The results clearly demonstrated that drought stress could improve proline content and different genotypes have different response to various drought levels.