1.3.3 Comparison of FFVT & FFCT
FFCT‘s rate of detection was significant for all degrees of hearing loss. This is in comparison to FFVT where the detection rate was only significant for normal hearing, moderate and severe hearing loss. FFCT had a higher sensitivity of 94.1% for normal hearing than 52% for FFVT. [Figure 4] However, with a marginal difference, FFVT was found to have a higher specificity than the click test, which was 96% compared to 93.9%. Yet, FFCT proved to have higher specificity in detecting other levels of hearing loss. [Figure 5] FFCT had performed with a higher rate of accuracy (94%) than FFVT (74.9%). A higher strength of the correlation, 0.97 was tabulated in conducting FFCT than FFVT(0.96).