The sinoatrial node in medication-resistant inappropriate sinus
tachycardia: to modify or to ablate?
Khalil El Gharib1*
1Hôtel-Dieu de France, Beirut, Lebanon
*Author for correspondence:
khalil.gharib@outlook.com
KEYWORDS: IST, sinus node modification, sinus node ablation,
radiofrequency ablation, surgical ablation
No conflict of interest to disclose
Funding: none
Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) is defined as a resting heart rate
>100 beats per minute (with a mean heart rate
>90 beats per minute over 24 hours) associated with highly
symptomatic palpitations(1). The syndrome is associated neither with
structural heart disease nor with any secondary cause of sinus
tachycardia(2) and evidence suggests that enhanced intrinsic
automaticity of the sinoatrial node, which can be due to
anti-β-adrenergic antibodies, is behind its genesis(3). However, it is
benign in terms of clinical outcomes and echocardiographic evidence of
ventricular dysfunction(4), being rarely associated with
tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy(3).
Patients with IST are essentially treated with ß-blockers to alleviate
their symptoms(5). Ivabradine, a drug that inhibits funny calcium
channels, particularly abundant in the SA node, showed modest benefit,
receiving class IIa recommendation in the treatment of IST(4). But, the
duration of medical therapy might be indefinite, and, a considerable
number of patients would respond inadequately, or have no response, even
after prolonged therapy(5). Historically, such patients would have
subtotal right atrial excision, atrioventricular junctional ablation
with permanent pacemaker implantation, or chemical occlusion of the
sinus node artery(6). These options are considered today unacceptable in
this setting, and other therapeutic approaches should be unveiled when
resistance to medical treatment appears.
Electrophysiological study was initially purely diagnostic, but recent
advances in technology have allowed us to intervene(7); patients with
ventricular and supraventricular tachyarrhythmias are successfully
treated with percutaneous catheter procedures. Of these, SA node
ablation/ modification has been proposed as alternative approaches in
IST that is not responding to medical treatment; trials reported
auspicious results, highlighted here.
Electrophysiologic mapping to the site of the earliest endocardial
activation during either spontaneous sinus tachycardia or
isoproterenol-induced sinus tachycardia has rendered these procedures
feasible(8). Additionally, combination with intracardiac
echocardiography permitted a more accurate electrophysiologic and
anatomic localization of the sinoatrial node(9).
Sinus node modification is not a focal ablation, but requires complete
abolition of the cranial portion of the SA node complex, the one that
exhibits the most of the autonomic activity(9). It is defined as
successful when the heart rate decreases by 30 beats per minute (bpm)
during isoproterenol infusion(8). Short-term success was also defined by
other investigators when there was a reduction of the baseline sinus
rate to less than 90 bpm and the sinus rate during isoproterenol
infusion by more than 20% or by 25%(8). The acute success rate for
modification has been varying between 76 and 100 % across trials, while
long-term clinical outcomes are modest at best, with reported freedom
from IST ranging from 23 to 85%(10).
Complications specific to SA node modification include superior vena
cava (SVC) syndrome, diaphragmatic paralysis, and sinus node
dysfunction(10). And while modification with conventional methods has
its setbacks, modification using laser energy can be considered in the
setting of IST. This modality creates clear-cut homogenous transmural
lesions of the myocardium that comprises the scattered “functional” SA
node(11). The burnt myocardium will then heal into a dense fibrous scar,
decreasing potential amplitudes. And when adapting laser energy settings
to the thickness of the myocardial wall, collateral damages such as
esophageal fistulae, lung burns, and phrenic nerve palsy will be
avoided(11); thus, this technique may prove itself as a new intriguing
alternative for the safe and effective treatment of IST.
SA node modification is apt in achieving acute reductions in
postprocedural heart rate. However, and as aforementioned, success rates
are suboptimal in terms of symptomatic control with a significant
recurrence rate(12). Catheter ablation aiming at either total exclusion
and obliteration of the SA node has been described and performed,
success being defined as a slowing of >50% from the
baseline rate of tachycardia along with a junctional escape rhythm(12).
With radiofrequency (RF) applications, the earliest local atrial
activation time would shift from a cranial location to a more caudal
one, usually at the mid-lateral right atrium(5). Reviews have reported
that acute success rates were consistently to be as high as 88.9%, with
an overall frequency of recurrence of 19.6%, the latter occurring
within a wide range of post-ablation intervals, anywhere from a few
weeks to several months after the procedure(12). Additionally, Takemoto
and colleagues documented a significant drop in B-type natriuretic
peptide levels, 6 to 12 months after ablation, suggesting fewer
stretching shears on cardiac muscle.
Two types of response of the sinus tachycardia to RFA were observed
across studies, whether a step-wise reduction in sinus rate accompanying
migration of the site of earliest atrial activation in a cranial-caudal
direction along the lateral right atrial wall, or an abrupt drop in
heart rate in response to RFA at a focal site of earliest atrial
activation(13).
However, RFA of inappropriate sinus tachycardia requires a large number
of applications of radiofrequency energy and is, as in SA node
modification, associated with a high recurrence rate(13). Complete
remission is achieved only in approximately 50% of patients in some
studies(14); longer history of IST and those reporting near
syncope/syncope having a higher probability of recurrence(15).
While other studies have shown that RF ablation of the SA node can
achieve even longer-term reductions in the sinus rate and relief of
symptoms in two-thirds of patients with drug-refractory, inappropriate
sinus tachycardia(13), aiming specific sites related to the SA node
should be elaborated, for better and optimal outcomes Killu and
colleagues created a lesion in the arcuate ridge resulting in complete
abolition of the tachycardia, since arrhythmias arising in this region
may exhibit both electrocardiographic and clinical similarities to
IST(16). This has led to consider ablation of the arcuate ridge as a
treatment of refractory IST, necessitating larger trials to confirm its
potential role.
Phrenic nerve injury is a severe and dreaded complication of SN
ablation(12). Pericarditis, right diaphragmatic paralysis, and SVC
syndrome are other undesirable side effects of the procedures, variously
reported in studies. but a common complication was observed in them all,
atrial tachyarrhythmias(12). It has been hypothesized that myocardial
pathology, such as inflammation and fibrosis, considered iatrogenic due
to the ablation procedures, may be promoting arrhythmias both in the
region of the SA node, as well as in remote locations(12). Through
multivariable analysis, higher resting heart rates post-ablation and
smaller cranial-to-caudal shifts have been defined as predictors of
atrial arrhythmias(15). In conclusion, catheter ablation could be
considered an effective treatment for highly symptomatic,
drug-refractory patients, even for those who did not respond to SA node
modification(5).
The sinus node is located close to the epicardial surface and
catheter-based ablations do not always make full-thickness lesions
across the atrial muscle, leading to failure of the ablation(17),
besides the numerous trabeculae and the widely variable anatomy.
Surgical ablation is not a first-line or routine management strategy for
IST, but it has been proposed when IST resists or recurs after SN
modification/ endocardial ablation(17). Effectively, in several studies,
epicardial lesions, through a single small incision in one of the
intercostal spaces, successfully slowed heart rate and shifted
activation to a more caudal location, and surprisingly, subsequent
endocardial lesions led to an even greater drop in heart rate and more
caudal site of earliest activation(18). These outcomes were again
replicated when using minimally invasive thoracoscopic ablation of the
epicardial site of the SA node, concluding of the promising efficacy and
the safety of this approach, since it preserves the phrenic nerve(17),
although continued follow-up after surgery is required.
Medication-resistant IST remains a medical challenge for physicians and
cardiologists; and in the era of great advances in interventional
cardiology, its treatment remains debatable. Sinus node modification/
ablation is not recommended as first-line therapy in IST, this procedure
should be considered only in drug-refractory patients who have severe
symptoms(13). Although the number of patients in the available studies
is generally small, both procedures have documented an encouraging
success rate in the short-term, while being less impressive in the
long-term. It has been hypothesized that this discrepancy is due to the
relatively large potential area of atrial pacemaker cells(18);
modification or ablation may fail to ablate or isolate all the pathways
that comprise the functional SA node because they often target the
anatomic part and the area of earliest atrial activation(19). Others
have explained that the long-term slowing in rhythm fails because these
procedures inconsistently produce transmural lesions in the right
atrium. Surgical treatment of IST has proposed a solution to the latter
conflict when isolating the SA node with a wide cuff of surrounding
atrial muscle(19). And with the advent of bipolar RF clamps and
minimally invasive cardiac surgical techniques with thoracoscopic
guidance, this approach appears more appealing than before, especially
when combined with endocardial ablation(19). But again, current data
specifies employing these techniques in highly selected cases.