AUC Difference
AUC differences (AUCDIFF), as expected, were
comparatively lower for the optimal models chosen by
AUCDIFF approaches over ORTESTapproaches for both fish and odonates (Figures 3c-d). While, the EXP
approach chose a greater number of optimal models with comparatively
larger AUCDIFF over any of the four sequential
approaches for both fish and odonates (Figure 3c-d). However, there were
statistically significant correlations for AUCDIFF of
the optimal models selected by the EXP approach to all the sequential
selection approaches (Table S4). The highest positive correlation was
found with ORTEST_PER for fish and with
ORTEST_BAL for odonates though correlation strength was
only moderate for the latter (Table S4).