Figure legends
Figure 1 Correlation of Mantel test between geographic distance
and F ST. A, Mantel test from 43
populations of P. villosa ; B, Mantel test from
populations of Group 1; C, Mantel test from populations of
Group 2
Figure 2 Dendrogram of P. villosa generated by
unweighted pair group method analysis (UPGMA) cluster analysis from the
genetic similarity matrix obtained using amplified fragment length
polymorphism genetic distance (see Figure S1 for population codes)
Figure 3 Neighbor‐Net split network of P. villosa based
on amplified fragment length polymorphism dataset using Jaccard’s
distances. Lines of red and yellow represent Group 1 and Group 2,
respectively
Figure 4 A two‐dimensional plot of the principal coordinate
analysis (PCoA) based on variation of amplified fragment length
polymorphism markers for P. villosa (see Figure S1 for population
codes)
Figure 5 Results of the Bayesian clustering analysis in
STRUCTURE of 210 individuals representing P. villosa. A,△K values from the mean log‐likelihood probabilities through
STRUCTURE runs where inferred cluster (K ) ranged from one to ten;B, Estimated genetic clustering for K = 2, where unique
colors correspond to assignment at different clusters; C,Geographic origin from 43 populations of P. villosa and their
color-coded grouping according to the structure analysis for the model
with K = 2
Figure 6 Potentially suitable climatic distribution of P.
villosa under different climate change scenarios in China
Figure 7 Present suitable climatic distribution of P.
villosa in China
Figure 8 Spatial shifts for P. villosa under climate
change scenarios
Figure 9 Results of the niche-identity test. A,Schoener’s D ; B, Warren’s I . The arrow in each
panel represents the observed niche similarity between occurrence points
for the corresponding pair of clusters. The histograms represent the
distribution of niche similarities obtained from pairs of pseudo niches
constructed by random resampling of occurrence points of the two
clusters
Figure S1 Localities of Group 1 (red), Group 2 (yellow) sampled
of P. villosa in the present study
Figure S2 Fluorescently‐labeled AFLPs generated using different
primer combinations. A, E ‐AAC/M ‐CAA; B,E ‐AAG/M ‐CAC; C, E ‐ACA/M ‐CAG; D,E ‐ACT/M ‐CAT; E, E ‐ACC/M ‐CTA; F,E ‐ACG/M ‐CTC; G, E ‐AGC/M ‐CTG;H, E ‐AGG/M ‐CTT
Figure
S3 The mean AUC of the test samples of P. villosa based on the
MaxEnt model