Preface

Let’s begin with two statements, two thoughts, two convictions, and one set of diametrically opposite worldviews:
If someone says, “I love God,” and hates his brother, he is a liar; for he who does not love his brother whom he has seen, how can he love God he has not seen? And this commandment we have from Him: that he who loves God must love his brother also” (1 John 4:20–21 NKJV\cite{bible1982new}
Here is the other statement:
“I had fantasies of unloading a revolver into the head of any white person that got in my way, burying their body and wiping my bloody hands as I walked away relatively guiltless with a bounce in my step”\cite{RN6934}.
The distance between the two statements—one born out of divine love and the other out of mortal hatred—is as far as heaven is from hell. The psychiatrist’s Freudian “id” is as bloated with self as her soul is depleted by sin. Even if she chose this wish-narrative as a shamanic therapy to excise the accumulated infection from a spiritual pathology, the effect is the same: self-satisfaction by homicide.
The former? Healing. Hopeful. Redemptive. The latter? Troubling. Chilling. Inconceivable. How does a human being come to such a place? 

The (Hopefully) Obvious Concern

That a physician and scholar should hold a lecture, “The Psychopathic Problem of the White Mind,”  in a prestigious school of medicine (Yale) to express her innermost feelings (not tested hypotheses, as one might expect from a scientist) about race through rhetorical exclusion —to underscore the dissimilarities between two groups of people for the purpose of denying the benefits of community, viz., a degree of life, liberty, and happiness—\cite{Angelopoulou_2001} would be almost inconceivable. Almost—because that same physician is actively (even if unwittingly) fermenting social anarchy based on the well-honed strategies of pitting people against people of the same nation using skin color (and a predictable socio-historical revisionist history to go with it, e.g., the 1619 Project)\cite{woodson2021red}. Division by identity-hatred is a well-documented méthode de succès (in the same way that the destruction of the Twin Towers on 9/11 was a success for the murderous terrorists who planned and executed the atrocity). The doctor's advocacy of murder as a sort of self-prescribed amphetamine to quench her homicidal yearnings (and, by her admission, to overcome her intense anxiety provoked by a perceived incorrigible presence of "whiteness"), based on a group of people of the same skin color, is, at once, repulsive and appalling. There is absolutely no fear of cliché in deducing, “If a medical doctor teaching before an elite graduate school audience can openly share her ’dream’ of murdering other human beings based on their genetically predisposed and comparatively lower levels of melanin, how many other madmen will carry it out?” Skin color has been demonstrated to be the product of a complex genetic journey that involves both human migration, generations of genetic dynamics, and the adaptability of human beings to live in certain environments \cite{RN6939}