References
1. El Haddad M, Taghji P, Phlips T, et al. Determinants of acute and
late pulmonary vein reconnection in contact force-guided pulmonary vein
isolation: identifying the weakest link in the ablation chain. Circ
Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017;10:e004867.
2. Ariyarathna N, Kumar S, Thomas SP, Stevenson WG, Michaud GF. Role of
Contact Force Sensing in Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias:
Evolution or History Repeating Itself? JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2018; 4:
707-723.
3. Petersen HH, Chen X, Pietersen A, Svendsen JH, Haunsø S. Tissue
temperatures and lesion size during irrigated tip catheter
radiofrequency ablation: an in vitro comparison of
temperature-controlled irrigated tip ablation, power-controlled
irrigated tip ablation, and standard temperature-controlled ablation.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000; 23: 8-17.
4. Nakagawa H, Yamanashi WS, Pitha JV, Arruda M, Wang X, Ohtomo K,
Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, Lazzara R, Jackman WM. Comparison of in vivo
tissue temperature profile and lesion geometry for radiofrequency
ablation with a saline-irrigated electrode versus temperature control in
a canine thigh muscle preparation. Circulation. 1995; 91:2264–2273.
5. Barkagan M, Leshem E, Rottmann M, Sroubek J, Shapira-Daniels A, Anter
E. Expandable Lattice Electrode Ablation Catheter: A Novel
Radiofrequency Platform Allowing High Current at Low Density for Rapid,
Titratable, and Durable Lesions. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2019; 12:
e007090.
6. Ikeda A, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, Shah DC, Fonck E, Yulzari A, Sharma
T, Pitha JV, Lazzara R, Jackman WM. Relationship between catheter
contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop
in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and
electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact
force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014; 7: 1174-80.
7. Seiler J, Roberts-Thomson KC, Raymond JM, Vest J, Delacretaz E,
Stevenson WG. Steam pops during irrigated radiofrequency ablation:
feasibility of impedance monitoring for prevention. Heart Rhythm 2008;
5: 1411-6.
8. Theis C, Rostock T, Mollnau H, Sonnenschein S, Himmrich E, Kämpfner
D, Ocete BQ, Bock K, Münzel T, Konrad T. The Incidence of Audible Steam
Pops Is Increased and Unpredictable With the ThermoCool® Surround Flow
Catheter During Left Atrial Catheter Ablation: A Prospective
Observational Study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2015; 26: 956-962.
9. Bourier F, Popa M, Kottmaier M, Maurer S, Bahlke F, Telishevska M,
Lengauer S, Koch-Büttner K, Kornmayer M, Risse E, Brkic A, Reents T,
Hessling G, Deisenhofer I. RF electrode-tissue coverage significantly
influences steam pop incidence and lesion size. J Cardiovasc
Electrophysiol 2021; 32:1594-1599.
10. Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Natale A, Albenque JP, Kautzner J,
Shah D, Michaud G, Wharton M, Harari D, Mahapatra S, Lambert H, Mansour
M. Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Safety and Effectiveness of a
Contact Force-Sensing Irrigated Catheter for Ablation of Paroxysmal
Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the TactiCath Contact Force Ablation
Catheter Study for Atrial Fibrillation (TOCCASTAR) Study. Circulation
2015; 132: 907-15.
11. Calzolari V, De Mattia L, Indiani S, Crosato M, Furlanetto A,
Licciardello C, Squasi PAM, Olivari Z. In Vitro Validation of the Lesion
Size Index to Predict Lesion Width and Depth After Irrigated
Radiofrequency Ablation in a Porcine Model. JACC Clin Electrophysiol
2017; 3: 1126-1135.
12. Tsutsui K, Kawano D, Mori H, Kato R, Ikeda Y, Sumitomo N, Fukaya H,
Iwanaga S, Nakano S, Muramatsu T, Matsumoto K. Characteristics and
optimal ablation settings of a novel, contact-force sensing and local
impedance-enabled catheter in an ex vivo perfused swine ventricle model.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2021. doi: 10.1111/jce.15253. Epub ahead of
print. PMID: 34559441.
13. Ching KC, Elayi CS, Oussama MW, Khan MN, Conor B, Karen P, Callahan
T, Zakaib J, Fahmy TS, Schweikert RA, Saliba W, Dresing T, Burkhardt JD,
Cummings JE, Arruda M, Natale A: Steam pops in real life: Confessions of
open irrigated catheters. Heart Rhythm 2007;4:S11(abstract).
14. Knecht S, Reichlin T, Pavlovic N, Schaer B, Osswald S, Sticherling
C, Kühne M. Contact force and impedance decrease during ablation depends
on catheter location and orientation: insights from pulmonary vein
isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter. J Interv Card
Electrophysiol 2015;43:297-306.
15. González-Suárez A, Berjano E, Guerra JM, Gerardo-Giorda L.
Computational Modeling of Open-Irrigated Electrodes for Radiofrequency
Cardiac Ablation Including Blood Motion-Saline Flow Interaction. PLoS
One 2016; 11:e0150356.
16. Winterfield JR, Jensen J, Gilbert T, Marchlinski F, Natale A, Packer
D, Reddy V, Mahapatra S, Wilber DJ. Lesion Size and Safety Comparison
Between the Novel Flex Tip on the FlexAbility Ablation Catheter and the
Solid Tips on the ThermoCool and ThermoCool SF Ablation Catheters. J
Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2016; 27: 102-9.