References
1. El Haddad M, Taghji P, Phlips T, et al. Determinants of acute and late pulmonary vein reconnection in contact force-guided pulmonary vein isolation: identifying the weakest link in the ablation chain. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017;10:e004867.
2. Ariyarathna N, Kumar S, Thomas SP, Stevenson WG, Michaud GF. Role of Contact Force Sensing in Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias: Evolution or History Repeating Itself? JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2018; 4: 707-723.
3. Petersen HH, Chen X, Pietersen A, Svendsen JH, Haunsø S. Tissue temperatures and lesion size during irrigated tip catheter radiofrequency ablation: an in vitro comparison of temperature-controlled irrigated tip ablation, power-controlled irrigated tip ablation, and standard temperature-controlled ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000; 23: 8-17.
4. Nakagawa H, Yamanashi WS, Pitha JV, Arruda M, Wang X, Ohtomo K, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, Lazzara R, Jackman WM. Comparison of in vivo tissue temperature profile and lesion geometry for radiofrequency ablation with a saline-irrigated electrode versus temperature control in a canine thigh muscle preparation. Circulation. 1995; 91:2264–2273.
5. Barkagan M, Leshem E, Rottmann M, Sroubek J, Shapira-Daniels A, Anter E. Expandable Lattice Electrode Ablation Catheter: A Novel Radiofrequency Platform Allowing High Current at Low Density for Rapid, Titratable, and Durable Lesions. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2019; 12: e007090.
6. Ikeda A, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, Shah DC, Fonck E, Yulzari A, Sharma T, Pitha JV, Lazzara R, Jackman WM. Relationship between catheter contact force and radiofrequency lesion size and incidence of steam pop in the beating canine heart: electrogram amplitude, impedance, and electrode temperature are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force and lesion size. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014; 7: 1174-80.
7. Seiler J, Roberts-Thomson KC, Raymond JM, Vest J, Delacretaz E, Stevenson WG. Steam pops during irrigated radiofrequency ablation: feasibility of impedance monitoring for prevention. Heart Rhythm 2008; 5: 1411-6.
8. Theis C, Rostock T, Mollnau H, Sonnenschein S, Himmrich E, Kämpfner D, Ocete BQ, Bock K, Münzel T, Konrad T. The Incidence of Audible Steam Pops Is Increased and Unpredictable With the ThermoCool® Surround Flow Catheter During Left Atrial Catheter Ablation: A Prospective Observational Study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2015; 26: 956-962.
9. Bourier F, Popa M, Kottmaier M, Maurer S, Bahlke F, Telishevska M, Lengauer S, Koch-Büttner K, Kornmayer M, Risse E, Brkic A, Reents T, Hessling G, Deisenhofer I. RF electrode-tissue coverage significantly influences steam pop incidence and lesion size. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2021; 32:1594-1599.
10. Reddy VY, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Natale A, Albenque JP, Kautzner J, Shah D, Michaud G, Wharton M, Harari D, Mahapatra S, Lambert H, Mansour M. Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Safety and Effectiveness of a Contact Force-Sensing Irrigated Catheter for Ablation of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: Results of the TactiCath Contact Force Ablation Catheter Study for Atrial Fibrillation (TOCCASTAR) Study. Circulation 2015; 132: 907-15.
11. Calzolari V, De Mattia L, Indiani S, Crosato M, Furlanetto A, Licciardello C, Squasi PAM, Olivari Z. In Vitro Validation of the Lesion Size Index to Predict Lesion Width and Depth After Irrigated Radiofrequency Ablation in a Porcine Model. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 2017; 3: 1126-1135.
12. Tsutsui K, Kawano D, Mori H, Kato R, Ikeda Y, Sumitomo N, Fukaya H, Iwanaga S, Nakano S, Muramatsu T, Matsumoto K. Characteristics and optimal ablation settings of a novel, contact-force sensing and local impedance-enabled catheter in an ex vivo perfused swine ventricle model. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2021. doi: 10.1111/jce.15253. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34559441.
13. Ching KC, Elayi CS, Oussama MW, Khan MN, Conor B, Karen P, Callahan T, Zakaib J, Fahmy TS, Schweikert RA, Saliba W, Dresing T, Burkhardt JD, Cummings JE, Arruda M, Natale A: Steam pops in real life: Confessions of open irrigated catheters. Heart Rhythm 2007;4:S11(abstract).
14. Knecht S, Reichlin T, Pavlovic N, Schaer B, Osswald S, Sticherling C, Kühne M. Contact force and impedance decrease during ablation depends on catheter location and orientation: insights from pulmonary vein isolation using a contact force-sensing catheter. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2015;43:297-306.
15. González-Suárez A, Berjano E, Guerra JM, Gerardo-Giorda L. Computational Modeling of Open-Irrigated Electrodes for Radiofrequency Cardiac Ablation Including Blood Motion-Saline Flow Interaction. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0150356.
16. Winterfield JR, Jensen J, Gilbert T, Marchlinski F, Natale A, Packer D, Reddy V, Mahapatra S, Wilber DJ. Lesion Size and Safety Comparison Between the Novel Flex Tip on the FlexAbility Ablation Catheter and the Solid Tips on the ThermoCool and ThermoCool SF Ablation Catheters. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2016; 27: 102-9.