"‘No ill will’: Ticcing on Moral Grounds" \citep*{Curtis_Wendlandt_2023}. "This chapter argues that tics are less blameworthy than other intentional actions, but that we often misconstrue them as morally salient behaviours."
\cite{Bervoets2023} et al published an interesting viewpoint following the similar lines of thought and inviting more inclusive patient based perspective. 
Coleman and Melia \cite{Coleman2023} investigated the topic of self-identity in females with TS. The  methodology was a focused semi-structured interview conducted via zoom.   Five themes were established: "I'm not normal", "I just want to be me", I'm a "people pleaser", seeing oneself as an "outsider", and "it's just part of me…it's not going anywhere".  The importance of work on self-esteem in the population of these patients was underlined.
An interesting topic of moral decision making in patients with TS was explored by \cite{Vicario2023}. All in all, the authors found higher inclination for utilitarian solutions of moral dilemmas in patients with TS. Of note, TS individuals had more tendency to quantify something as morally wrong or right.  The authors concluded that there might be neurobiological correlates of inappropriate behaviors in TS that could be an underlying cause of the higher utilitarian moral decision-making.