References
  1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Apr;89(4):501-6. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6. PMID: 9083302.
  2. Wu JM, Kawasaki A, Hundley AF, Dieter AA, Myers ER, Sung VW. Predicting the number of women who will undergo incontinence and prolapse surgery, 2010 to 2050. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;205(3):230.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.046. Epub 2011 Apr 2. PMID: 21600549; PMCID: PMC3630997.
  3. Bonadio M, Meini M, Spitaleri P, Gigli C. Current microbiological and clinical aspects of urinary tract infections. Eur Urol. 2001 Oct;40(4):439-44; discussion 445. doi: 10.1159/000049813. PMID: 11713400.
  4. Phipps S, Lim YN, McClinton S, Barry C, Rane A, N’Dow JMO. Short term urinary catheter policies following urogenital surgery in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 2. Art. No.: CD004374. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004374.pub2.
  5. Higgins J, Green S, (Editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane collaboration 2011. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org
  6. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009;6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
  7. Schünemann HJ, Brozek J, Guyatt GH, Oxman AD. Handbook for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations using the GRADE approach. Updated October 2013. Available from https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html.
  8. Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Higgins J, Vist GE, Glasziou P, Guyatt GH. Chapter 11: Presenting results and ‘Summary of findings” tables. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.handbook.cochrane.org.
  9. Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, Moberg J, Brignardello-Petersen R, Akl EA, Davoli M, et al. GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction. BMJ 2016;353:i2016.
  10. Subramanya J, Curtiss N, Balachandran A, Duckett J. Should we use a vaginal pack to reduce blood loss at the time of prolapse surgery? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;206:181-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.09.025.
  11. Rajan P, Soundara Raghavan S, Sharma D. Study comparing 3 hour and 24 hour post-operative removal of bladder catheter and vaginal pack following vaginal surgery: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Womens Health. 2017;17(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0431-x.
  12. Glavind K, Mørup L, Madsen H, Glavind J. A prospective, randomised, controlled trial comparing 3 hour and 24 hour postoperative removal of bladder catheter and vaginal pack following vaginal prolapse surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(9):1122-5. doi: 10.1080/00016340701505317.
  13. Urzua M, Rondini C, Astorquiza M, Braun H. Post vaginal hysterectomy packing, is it worth? Prospective randomized study. International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction, 2013, 24, S85‐S86. doi.org/10.1007/s00192-013-2101-3.
  14. Baumgarten M, Vervest H, Vos C. Short term post operative complications after vaginal packing, a randomized controlled study. ICS/IUGA 2010 Toronto, Canada, August 2010. Abstract 826.
  15. Westermann LB, Crisp CC, Oakley SH, Mazloomdoost D, Kleeman SD, Benbouajili JM, et al. To pack or not to pack? A randomized trial of vaginal packing after vaginal reconstructive surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2016; 22:111–7. PMID: 26825408.
  16. Thiagamoorthy G, Khalil A, Cardozo L, Srikrishna S, Leslie G, Robinson D. The value of vaginal packing in pelvic floor surgery: a randomised double-blind study. Int Urogynecol J 2014; 25:585–91. PMID: 24310987.
  17. McGuinness, LA, Higgins, JPT. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Syn Meth. 2020; 1- 7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1411.
  18. Yoong W, Sivashanmugarajan V, Relph S, Bell A, Fajemirokun E, Davies T, Munro K, Chigwidden K, Evan F, Lodhi W; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Team for Gynaecology and Anaesthesia. Can enhanced recovery pathways improve outcomes of vaginal hysterectomy? Cohort control study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Jan-Feb;21(1):83-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.06.007. Epub 2013 Jul 10. PMID: 23850899.
  19. Kalogera E, Dowdy SC. Enhanced Recovery Pathway in Gynecologic Surgery: Improving Outcomes Through Evidence-Based Medicine. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016 Sep;43(3):551-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2016.04.006. PMID: 27521884.
  20. Relph S, Bell A, Sivashanmugarajan V, Munro K, Chigwidden K, Lloyd S, Fakokunde A, Yoong W. Cost effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery programme for vaginal hysterectomy: a comparison of pre and post-implementation expenditures. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2014;29(4):399-406.
  21. Ottesen M, Sørensen M, Rasmussen M, Smidt-Jensen S, Kehlet H, Ottesen B. Fast track vaginal surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2002; 81(2):138-46. PMID: 11942904.
  22. Jeppson PC, Balgobin S, Rahn DD, Matteson KA, Dieter AA, Ellington DR, Aschkenazi SO, Grimes C, Mamik MM, Balk EM, Murphy M; Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group. Comparison of Vaginal Hysterectomy Techniques and Interventions for Benign Indications: A Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;129(5):877-886. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001995. PMID: 28383375.
  23. Rachaneni S, Dua A. Interventions to reduce morbidity from vault hematoma following vaginal hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 2019; 30(7):1061-1070. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3829-6. PMID: 30498932.