References
Amézquita, A., Castro, L., Arias, M., González, M., & Esquivel, C.
(2013). Field but not lab paradigms support generalisation by predators
of aposematic polymorphic prey: the Oophaga histrionica complex.Evolutionary Ecology, 27 , 769–782.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-013-9635-1
Amézquita, A., Ramos, O., González, M. C., Rodríguez, C., Medina, I.,
Simões, P. I., & Lima, A. P. (2017). Conspicuousness, color
resemblance, and toxicity in geographically diverging mimicry: The
pan‐Amazonian frog Allobates femoralis . Evolution, 71 ,
1039–1050. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13170
Angelo, C. (2019). Brazil freezes science spending. Nature, 568(7751),
155-156. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01079-9
Ávila-Pires, T. C. S. D., Hoogmoed, M. S., & Rocha, W. A. D. (2010).
Notes on the Vertebrates of northern Pará, Brazil: a forgotten part of
the Guianan Region, I. Herpetofauna, Boletim do Museu Paraense
Emílio Goeldi Ciências Naturais, 5 , 13–112
Baldo, D., Borteiro, C., Kolenc, F., & Rosset, S. (2012). The taxonomic
status of Melanophryniscus orejasmirandai Prigioni & Langone,
1987 “1986” (Anura: Bufonidae). Zootaxa, 3235 , 45–61.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3235.1.4
Chatelain, P., Elias, M., Fontaine, C., Villemant, C., Dajoz, I., &
Perrard, A. (2023). Müllerian mimicry among bees and wasps: a review of
current knowledge and future avenues of research. Biological
Reviews, 2023, 00–00. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12955
Chouteau, M., & Angers, B. (2011). The role of predators in maintaining
the geographic organization of aposematic signals. The American
Naturalist, 178 , 810-817. https://doi.org/10.1086/662667
Crump, M. L. (1988). Aggression in harlequin frogs: male-male
competition and a possible conflict of interest between the sexes.Animal Behaviour, 36 , 1064–1077.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80066-6
Daly, J. W., Garraffo, H. M., Spande, T. F., Yeh, H. J. C., Peltzer, P.
M., Cacivio, P. M., Baldo, J. D. & Faivovich, J. (2008). Indolizidine
239Q and quinolizidine 275I. Major alkaloids in two Argentinian bufonid
toads (Melanophryniscus ). Toxicon, 52 , 858–870.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.08.016
Duellman, W. E., & Trueb, L. (1986). Biology of Amphibians . New
York McGraw-Hill.
Escobar, H. (2019). Brazilian president attacks deforestation data.Science, 365 , 419.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.365.6452.419
Fernandes, G. W., Vale, M. M., Overbeck, G. E., Bustamante, M. M. C.,
Grelle, C. E. V., Pillar, V. D. (2017). Dismantling Brazil’s science
threatens global biodiversity heritage. Perspectives in Ecology
and Conservation, 15 , 239–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
Frost, D. R. (2022). Amphibian species of the world: An online
reference . American Museum of Natural History.
Gehara, M., Summers, K., & Brown, J. L. (2013). Population expansion,
isolation and selection: novel insights on the evolution of color
diversity in the strawberry poison frog. Evolutionary Ecology,
27 , 797–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-013-9652-0
Hegna, R. H., Saporito, R. A. & Donnelly, M. A. (2013). Not all colors
are equal: predation and color polytypism in the aposematic poison frogOophaga pumilio . Evolutionary Ecology, 27 , 831–845.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-012-9605-z
Heyer, W. R., Rand, A. S., da Cruz, C. A. G., Peixoto, O. L., & Nelson,
C. E. (1990). frogs of Boracéia. Arquivos de zoologia, 31 ,
231–410.
Hödl, W., & Amézquita, A. (2001). Visual signaling in anuran
amphibians. In: Ryan, M. J., editor. Anuran communication .
Washington (DC): Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press. p. 121–141.
Hoffman, E. A., & Blouin, M. S. (2000). A review of colour and pattern
polymorphisms in anurans. Biological Journal of the Linnean
Society, 70 , 633–665.
Jeckel, A. M., Kocheff, S., Saporito, R. A. & Grant, T. (2019).
Geographically separated orange and blue populations of the Amazonian
poison frog Adelphobates galactonotus (Anura, Dendrobatidae) do
not differ in alkaloid composition or palatability. Chemoecology,
29 , 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00049-019-00291-3
Jorge, R. F., Ferrão, M., & Lima, A. P. (2020a). Out of bound: a new
threatened harlequin toad (bufonidae, Atelopus ) from the outer
borders of the Guiana shield in central Amazonia described through
integrative taxonomy. Diversity , 12 , 310.
https://doi.org/10.3390/d12080310
Jorge, R. F., Magnusson, W. E., Silva, D. A. D., Polo, E. M., & Lima,
A. P. (2020). Urban growth threatens the lowland Amazonian Manaus
harlequin frog which represents an evolutionarily significant unit
within the genus Atelopus (Amphibia: Anura: Bufonidae).Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research ,58 , 1195–1205. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12390
La Marca, E., Lips, K. L., Lötters, S., Puschendorf, R., Ibáñez, R.,
Rueda-Almonacid, J. V., Schulte, R., Marty, C., Castro, F.,
Manzanilla-Puppo, J., García-Pérez, J. E., Bolaños, F., Chaves, G.,
Pounds, J. A., Toral, E., & Young, B. E. (2005). Catastrophic
population declines and extinctions in Neotropical harlequin frogs
(Bufonidae: Atelopus ). Biotropica, 37 , 190–201.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7429.2005.00026.x
Lescure, J. (1981). Contribution al’étude des Amphibiens de Guyane
française. VIII. Validation d’Atelopus spumarius Cope, 1871, et
désignation d’un néotype. Description d’Atelopus spumariusbarbotini nov. ssp. Données étho-écologiques et biogéographiques
sur les Atelopus du groupe flavescens (Anoures,
Bufonidées). Bulletin du Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle.
Paris, 3 , 893–910.
Lima, J. D. (2008). A herpetofauna do Parque Nacional do Montanhas do
Tumucumaque, Amapá, Brasil, Expedições I a V. In: Bernard, E., editor.Inventários Biológicos Rápidos no Parque Nacional Montanhas do
Tumucumaque, Amapá, Brasil . Arlington (VA): Conservation International.
p. 38–50.
Lindquist, E. D., & Hetherington, T. E. (1996). Field studies on visual
and acoustic signaling in the “earless” Panamanian golden frog,Atelopus zeteki . Journal of Herpetology, 30 , 347–354.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1565171
Lindquist, E. D., & Hetherington, T. E. (1998). Semaphoring in an
earless frog: the origin of a novel visual signal. Animal
Cognition, 1 , 83–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100710050012
Loeffler-Henry, K., Kang, C., & Sherratt, T. N. (2023). Evolutionary
transitions from camouflage to aposematism: Hidden signals play a
pivotal role. Science, 379 , 1136–1140.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.ade5156
Loetters, S., Van der Meijden, A., Coloma, L. A., Boistel, R., Cloetens,
P., Ernst, R., Lehr, E., & Veith, M. (2011). Assessing the molecular
phylogeny of a near extinct group of vertebrates: the Neotropical
harlequin frogs (Bufonidae; Atelopus). Systematics and
Biodiversity, 9 , 45–57.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2011.557403
Lötters, S., Plewnia, A., Hoenig, A., Jung, A., Laudor, J., & Ziegler,
T. (2022). The gastromyzophorous tadpole of the pink harlequin frog from
Suriname with comments on the taxonomy of Guianan Clade Atelopus
(Amphibia, Bufonidae). Zootaxa, 5087 , 591–598.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5087.4.7
Lötters, S., Schulte, R., Córdova, J. H., & Veith, M. (2005).
Conservation priorities for harlequin frogs (Atelopus spp.) of
Peru. Oryx, 39 , 343–346.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605305000852
Lötters, S., Haas, W., Schick, S., & Böhme, W. (2002). On the
systematics of the harlequin frogs (Amphibia: Bufonidae:Atelopus ) from Amazonia. II: redescription of Atelopus pulcher
(Boulenger, 1882) from the eastern Andean versant in Peru.Salamandra, 38 , 165–184.
Maan, M. E., & Cummings, M. E. (2008). Female preferences for
aposematic signal components in a polymorphic poison frog.Evolution, 62 , 2334–2345.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00454.x
Mebs, D., Lorentz, M., Yotsu-Yamashita, M., Rößler, D. C., Ernst, R., &
Lötters, S. (2018). Geographic range expansion of tetrodotoxin in
amphibians – first record in Atelopus hoogmoedi from the Guiana
Shield. Toxicon, 150 , 175–179.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.05.011
Noonan, B. P., & Gaucher, P. (2005). Phylogeography and demography of
Guianan harlequin toads (Atelopus ): diversification within a
refuge. Molecular Ecology, 14 , 3017–3031.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02624.x
Noonan, B. P. & Comeault, A. A. (2009). The role of predator selection
on polymorphic aposematic poison frogs. Biology letters, 5 ,
51–54. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0586
Peres, C. A., Ritter, C. D., & Campos-Silva, J. (2023). Renewed
environmental governance scenarios in the Brazilian Amazon. Trends
in Ecology & Evolution, 38 , 389–390. 10.1016/j.tree.2023.02.009
Pyron, R. A., & Wiens, J. J. (2013). Large-scale phylogenetic analyses
reveal the causes of high tropical amphibian diversity.Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280 ,
20131622. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1622
Richards-Zawacki, C. L., Yeager, J., Bart, H. P. S. (2013). No evidence
for differential survival or predation between sympatric color morphs of
an aposematic poison frog. Evolutionary Ecology, 27 , 783–795.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-013-9636-0
Rößler, D. C., Lötters, S., Mappes, J., Valkonen, J. K., Menin, M.,
Lima, A. P., & Pröhl, H. (2019). Sole coloration as an unusual
aposematic signal in a Neotropical toad. Scientific Reports, 9 ,
1128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37705-1
Rojas, D. P., Stow, A., Amézquita, A., Simões, P. I., & Lima, A. P.
(2015). No predatory bias with respect to colour familiarity for the
aposematic Adelphobates galactonotus (Anura: Dendrobatidae).Behaviour, 152 , 1637–1657.
https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003297
Rojas, D., Lima, A. P., Momigliano, P., Simões, P. I., Dudaniec, R. Y.,
Avila-Pires, T. C. S., Hoogmoed, M. S., Bitar, Y O. C., Kaefer, I. L.,
Amézquita, A., & Stow, A. (2020). The evolution of polymorphism in the
warning coloration of the Amazonian poison frog Adelphobates
galactonotus . Heredity, 124 , 439–456.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-019-0281-4
Rudh, A., Rogell, B., & Hȍglund, J. (2007). Non-gradual variation in
color morphs of the strawberry poison frog Dendrobates pumilio :
genetic and geographical isolation suggests a role for selection in
maintaining polymorphism. Molecular Ecology, 16 , 4284–4294.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03479.x
Rueda Almonacid J. V., Rodríguez Mahecha, J. V., La Marca, E., Lötters,
S., Kahn, T., & Ângulo, A. (2005). Ranas Arlequines. Conservación
Internacional Series libretas de Campo . Bogotá Colombia: Conservación
internacional Colombia.
Silva, G. W. B., Cornélio, G. S., Oliveira, E. A., Trindade, N. G. P.,
França, I., & Hernández Ruz, E. J. (2020). A candidate species
currently classified as Atelopus hoogmoedi (Anura: Bufonidae) in
the eastern Amazon, Pará, Brazil. Genetics and Molecular Research
19 , gmr18392.
Silva-e-Silva, Y. B., & Costa-Campos, C. E. (2018). Anuran species
composition of Cancão Municipal Natural Park, Municipality of Serra do
Navio, Amapá state, Brazil. ZooKeys , 762 , 131–148.
https://doi.org/10.3897%2Fzookeys.762.22634
Tazzyman, S. J., & Iwasa, Y. (2010). Sexual selection can increase the
effect of random genetic drift—a quantitative genetic model of
polymorphism in Oophaga pumilio , the strawberry poison-dart frog.Evolution, 64 , 1719–1728.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00923.x
Toledo, L.F. and Haddad, C.F.B. (2009). Colors and some morphological
traits as defensive mechanisms in anurans. International Journal
of Zoology, 910892 , 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/910892
Valencia, L. M., & Fonte, L. F. M. (2022). Collaborative work brings
hope for threatened harlequin toads. Oryx, 56 , 12–12.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605321001319
Wells, K. (2007). The ecology and behavior of amphibians. Chicago (IL):
University of Chicago Press.
Willink, B., García-Rodríguez, A., Bolaños, F., & Pröhl, H. (2014). The
interplay between multiple predators and prey colour divergence.Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 113 , 580–589.
https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12355
Yotsu-Yamashita, M., & Tateki, E. (2010). First report on toxins in the
Panamanian toads Atelopus limosus , A. glyphus and A.
certus . Toxicon, 55 , 153–156.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.07.003
Zamora-Camacho, F. J., & Comas, M. (2019). Beyond sexual dimorphism and
habitat boundaries: coloration correlates with morphology, age, and
locomotor performance in a toad. Evolutionary Biology, 46 ,
60–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-018-9466-7