REFERENCES
Abdala-Roberts, L., Hernández-Cumplido, J., Chel-Guerrero, L., Betancur-Ancona, D., Benrey, B. and Moreira, X. 2016. Effects of plant intra-specific genetic diversity across three trophic levels: Underlying mechanisms and plant traits. – Am. J. Bot. 103: 1810–1818.
Agren, J. 1988. Sexual differences in biomass and nutrient allocation in the dioecious Rubus chamaemorus . – Ecology 69: 962-973.
Agren, J., Danell, K., Elmqvist, T., Ericson, L. and Hjaltén, J. 1999. Sexual dimorphism and biotic interactions. – In: Geber, M. A., Dawson, T. E. and Delph, L. F. (eds), Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants . Springer, pp. 123-148.
Ashman, T. L. and King, E. 2005. Are flower-visiting ants mutualists or antagonists? A study in a gynodioecious wild strawberry. – Am. J. Bot. 92: 891-5. doi: 10.3732/ajb.92.5.891
Bañuelos, M. J., Sierra, M. and Obeso, J. R. 2004. Sex, secondary compounds and asymmetry. Effects on plant-herbivore interaction in a dioecious shrub. – Acta Oecol. 25: 151–157.
Barrett, S. C. H. and Hough, J. 2013. Sexual dimorphism in flowering plants. – J. Exp. Bot. 64:67–82. doi:10.1093/jxb/ers308
Bawa, K. S. and Opler, P. A. 1975. Dioecism in tropical forest trees. – Evolution 29: 167–179.
Boecklen, W. J., Mopper, S. and Price, P. W. 1990. Sex and drugs and herbivores: Sex-biased herbivory in arroyo willow (Salix lasiolepis ). – Ecology 71: 581-588. doi:10.2307/1940311
Bickerton, M. W. and Hamilton, G. C. 2012. Effects of intercropping with flowering plants on predation of Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) eggs by generalist predators in bell peppers. – Environ. Entomol. 41: 612-620.
Cano-Santana, Z. 1994. Flujo de energía a través de Sphenarium purpurascens (Orthoptera: Acrididae) y productividad primaria neta aérea en una comunidad xerófita. – PhD thesis, Univ. Nal. Autón. Méx.
Carneiro, M. A., Fernandes, G. W., de Souza, O. F. and Souza, W. V. 2006. Sex-mediated herbivory by galling insects on Baccharis concinna (Asteraceae). – Rev. Bras. Entomol. 50: 394–398. doi:10.1590/S0085-56262006000300009
Castillo-Argüero, S., Montes-Cartas, G., Romero-Romero, M. A., Martínez-Orea, Y., Guadarrama-Chávez, P., Sánchez-Gallén, I. and Nuñez-Castillo, O. 2004. Dinámica y conservación de la flora del matorral xerófilo de la Reserva Ecológica del Pedregal de San Ángel (D.F., México). – Bol. Soc. Bot. Mex. 74: 51-75.
Cepeda-Cornejo, V. and Dirzo, R. 2010. Sex-related differences in reproductive allocation, growth, defense and herbivory in three dioecious neotropical palms. – PLoS ONE 5: e9824.
Chen, B. and Wise, D. 1999. Bottom-up limitation of predaceous arthropods in a detritus-based terrestrial food web. – Ecology 80: 761-772. doi:10.1890/0012-9658
Cornelissen, T. and Stiling, P. 2005. Perfect is best: low leaf fluctuating asymmetry reduces herbivory by leaf miners. – Oecologia 142: 46-56.
Danell, K., Elmqvist, T., Ericson, L. and Salomonson, A. 1985. Sexuality in willows and preference by bark-eating voles: defence or not? – Oikos 44: 82-90.
Dai, X., et al. 2014. Seasonal changes in the concentrations of plant secondary metabolites and their effects on food selection byMicrotus oeconomus . – Mamm. Biol. 79: 215-220.
Delph, L. F. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in life history. – In: Geber, M. A., Dawson, T. E. and Delph, L. F. (eds) Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants . Springer, pp. 149–174.
Delph, L. F., Ying, L. and Jayne, L. D. 1993. Patterns of resource allocation in a dioecious Carex (Cyperaceae). – Am. J. Bot. 80: 607–615. doi:10.2307/2445429
Eckhart, V. M. 1999. Sexual dimorphism in flowers and inflorescences. – In: Geber, M. A., Dawson, T. E. and Delph, L. F. (eds) Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants . Springer, pp 123–148.
Elmqvist, T. and Gardfjell, H. 1988. Differences in response to defoliation between males and females of Silene dioica . – Oecologia 77: 225-230. doi:10.1007/BF00379190
García-García, P. L. and Cano-Santana, Z. 2015. Nutritional ecology, growth and density of Acronyctodes mexicanaria (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) on a dioecious plant Buddleja cordata(Scrophulariaceae). – Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 86: 172-177. doi:10.7550/rmb.44382
Granados-Sánchez, D., Ruíz-Puga, P. and Barrera-Escorcia, H. 2008. Ecología de la herbivoria. – Rev. Chapingo Ser. Cienc. For. Ambiente. 14: 51-64.
Gruner, D. 2004. Attenuation of top-down and bottom-up processes in a complex terrestrial community. – Ecology 85: 3010-3022. doi:10.1890/04-0020
Han P., Lavoir A.V., Rodriguez-Saona C., and Desneux N. 2022. Bottom-Up Forces in Agroecosystems and Their Potential Impact on Arthropod Pest Management. ­– Ann. Rev. Entomol. 7;67: 239-259. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-060121-060505.
Harris, M. S. and Pannell, J. R. 2008. Roots, shoots and reproduction: sexual dimorphism in size and costs of reproductive allocation in an annual herb. – P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 275: 2595–2602. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0585
Hjaltén, J. 1992. Plant sex and hare feeding preferences. – Oecologia 89: 253-256. doi:10.1007/BF00317225
Hjaltén, J., Ástrom, M., Áberg, E. and Danell, K. 1993. Biased sex ratios in Spanish populations of Pistacialentiscus(Anacardiaceae): The possible role of herbivory. – An. Jard. Bot. Madr. 51: 49-53.
Hsieh, T. C., Ma, K. H. and Chao, A. 2016. iNEXT: An R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). – Methods Ecol. Evol. 7: doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12613
Jost, L. 2006. Entropy and diversity. – Oikos 113: 363–375. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14714.x
Kabir, M. F., K. M. Moritz, and Stenberg, J. A. 2014. Plant-sex-biased tritrophic interactions on dioecious willow. – Ecosphere 5: 153. doi:10.1890/ES14-00356.1
Kersch-Becker, M. F., Kessler, A. and Thaler, J. S. 2017. Plant defences limit herbivore population growth by changing predator-prey interactions. – Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 284: 20171120. doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.1120
Kessler, A. and Heil, M. 2011. The multiple faces of indirect defences and their agents of natural selection. – Funct. Ecol. 25: 348-357. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01818.x.
Letourneau, D. K., Armbrecht, I., Salguero-Rivera, B., Montoya-Lerma, J., Jiménez-Carmona, E., Constanza Daza, M., Escobar, S., Galindo, V., Gutiérrez, C., Duque-López, S., López-Mejía, J., Acosta-Rangel, M. A., Herrera-Rangel, J., Rivera, L., Saavedra, C. A., Torres, A. M., Reyes-Trujillo, A. 2011. Does plant diversity benefit agroecosystems? A synthetic review. – Ecol. Appl. 21: 9-21. doi10.2307/29779633.
Lindeman, R. L. 1942. The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. – Ecology 23: 399-417. doi:10.1007/BF02464428
Mooney, K. A., Pratt, R. T. and Singer, M. S. 2012. The tri-trophic interactions hypothesis: interactive effects of host plant quality, diet breadth and natural enemies on herbivores. – PLoS ONE 7: e34403. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034403
Mooney, K. A. and Singer, M. S. 2001. Plant variation in herbivore-enemy interactions in natural systems. – Cambridge University Press.
Moreira, X., et al. 2019. Impacts of urbanization on insect herbivory and plant defences in oak trees. – Oikos 128: 113–123.
Nell, C. S., Abdala-Roberts, L., Parra-Tabla, V. and Mooney, K. A. 2018. Tropical tree diversity mediates foraging and predatory effects of insectivorous birds. – Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 285: 20181842. doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.1842
Norman, M. 2000. Buddlejaceae. – In: Luteyn, J. L., Cary, M. F. and Gradstein, S. R. (eds), Flora Neotropica. Monografía 81 . The New York Botanical Garden, pp. 1-16
Obeso, J. R. 2002. The cost of reproduction in plants. Tansley review no. 139. – New Phytol. 155: 321-348.
Oksanen, L. 1988. Ecosystem organization: mutualism and cybernetics of plain Darwinian struggle for existence. – Am. Nat. 131: 424–444.
Pacini, E. and Nepi, M. 2007. Nectar production and presentation. – In: Nicolson, S. W., Nepi, M. and Pacini, E. (eds), Nectaries and nectar . Springer, pp. 167–214.
Petry, W.K., et al. 2013. Mechanisms underlying plant sexual dimorphism in multi-trophic arthropod communities. – Ecology 94: 2055–2065.
Rabska, M., Pers-Kamczyc, E., Żytkowiak, R., Adamczyk, D., Iszkuło, G. 2020. Sexual dimorphism in the chemical composition of male and female in the dioecious tree, Juniperus communis L., growing under different nutritional conditions. – Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21: 8094. doi:10.3390/ijms21218094
Ribeiro-Mendes, H. Nt., Marques, E. S. A., Silva., I. M. and Fernandes, G. W. 2002. Influence of host-plant sex and habitat on survivorship of insect galls within the geographical range of the host-plant. – Trop. Zool. 15: 5-15. doi:10.1080/03946975.2002.10531163
Rzedowski, J. 1954. Vegetación del Pedregal de San Ángel (Distrito Federal, México). – An. Esc. Nal. Cienc. Biol. Inst. Pol. Nal 8: 59-129.
Sanjuan-Trejo, G., Mejia, D. and Moreno, C. E. 2021 Ensambles de artrópodos asociados a los frutos de garambullo (Myrtillocactus geometrizans ) en dos localidades del valle del Mezquital, Hidalgo, México. – Rev. Mex. Biodivers. 92: e923487.
Sargent, R. D. and McKeough, A.D. 2022. New evidence suggests no sex bias in herbivory or plant defense. – Am. Nat. 200: 435–447.
Schoonhoven, L. M., Van Loon, J. J. A. and Dicke, M. 2005. Insect-Plant Biology. – Oxford University Press.
Schowalter, T. D. 2006. Insect Ecology. An Ecosystem Approach. – Elsevier.
Scogings, P. F., Hattas, D., Skarpe, C., Hjaltén, J., Dziba, L., Zobolo, A. and Rooke, T. 2015. Seasonal variations in nutrients and secondary metabolites in semi-arid savannas depend on year and species. – J. of Arid Environ. 114: doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.11.003.
Sinclair, J. P., Emlen, J. and, Freeman, D. C. 2012. Biased sex ratios in plants: theory and trends. – Bot. Rev. 78: 63–86. doi:10.1007/s12229-011-9065-0
Strong, D. R., Lawton, J. H. and Southwood, R. 1984. Insects on plants: community patterns and mechanisms. – Blackwell Scientific.
Suguiyama, V., Silva, E., Meirelles, S., Centeno, D. and Braga, M. 2014. Leaf metabolite profile of the Brazilian resurrection plantBarbacenia purpurea Hook. (Velloziaceae) shows two time-dependent responses during desiccation and recovering. – Front. Plant Sci. 5: 96. doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00096.
Tsuji, K. and Fukami, T. 2018. Community-wide consequences of sexual dimorphism: evidence from nectar microbes in dioecious plants. – Ecology 99: 2476-2484. doi:10.1002/ecy.2494
Utsumi, S., Nakamura, M. and Ohgushi, T. 2009. Community consequences of herbivore-induced bottom-up trophic cascades: The importance of resource heterogeneity. – J. Anim. Ecol. 78: 953–963. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01570.x1
Vargas, N. A. 2001. Longaniaceae. – In: Rzedowski, J and Rzedowski, G. (eds), Flora Fanerogámica del Valle de México . Instituto de Ecología A.C. y Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad pp. 546-550.
Wackers, F. L., van Rijn, P. C. J., and Bruin, J. 2005.Plant-provided food for carnivorous insects: A protective mutualism and its applications. – Cambridge University Press.
Yang, W., et al. (2020). Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry-based metabolomics analysis of flavonoids and anthraquinones in Fagopyrum tataricum L. Gaertn. (Tartary buckwheat) seeds to trace morphological variations. – Food Chem. 331: 127354. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127354
Zhang, L., Rana, I., Shaffer, R.M., Taioli, E., and Sheppard, L. 2019. Exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides and risk for non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a meta-analysis and supporting evidence. – Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research 781: 186-206. doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2019.02.001