a Pregnancy rate ~ sqrt(age) +
bodyweight + motorized recreation + non-motorized recreation (the
predictors of the pregnancy rate model cause a 24% reduction in the
absolute value of the log-likelihood parameter); b
beta’s of continuous independent variables are standardized;
c * = p < 0.05 ** = p < 0.01 *** =
p < 0.001; d Reference value = presence;
e Bodyweight ~ age +
age2 + motorized recreation + non-motorized recreation
+ (1|year) (σ2 year:
5.27 (± 2.30) total variance explained: 30%); Control variables:
density red deer (t-3 and t0) available
habitat mean annual precipitation and mean annual temperature were
dropped during model selection and did not affect pregnancy rates and
bodyweight. |
a Pregnancy rate ~
sqrt(age) + bodyweight + motorized recreation + non-motorized recreation
(the predictors of the pregnancy rate model cause a 24% reduction in
the absolute value of the log-likelihood parameter); b
beta’s of continuous independent variables are standardized;
c * = p < 0.05 ** = p < 0.01 *** =
p < 0.001; d Reference value = presence;
e Bodyweight ~ age +
age2 + motorized recreation + non-motorized recreation
+ (1|year) (σ2 year: 5.27
(± 2.30) total variance explained: 30%); Control variables: density red
deer (t-3 and t0) available habitat mean
annual precipitation and mean annual temperature were dropped during
model selection and did not affect pregnancy rates and bodyweight. |
a Pregnancy rate ~ sqrt(age) +
bodyweight + motorized recreation + non-motorized recreation (the
predictors of the pregnancy rate model cause a 24% reduction in the
absolute value of the log-likelihood parameter); b
beta’s of continuous independent variables are standardized;
c * = p < 0.05 ** = p < 0.01 *** =
p < 0.001; d Reference value = presence;
e Bodyweight ~ age +
age2 + motorized recreation + non-motorized recreation
+ (1|year) (σ2 year:
5.27 (± 2.30) total variance explained: 30%); Control variables:
density red deer (t-3 and t0) available
habitat mean annual precipitation and mean annual temperature were
dropped during model selection and did not affect pregnancy rates and
bodyweight. |
a Pregnancy rate ~
sqrt(age) + bodyweight + motorized recreation + non-motorized recreation
(the predictors of the pregnancy rate model cause a 24% reduction in
the absolute value of the log-likelihood parameter); b
beta’s of continuous independent variables are standardized;
c * = p < 0.05 ** = p < 0.01 *** =
p < 0.001; d Reference value = presence;
e Bodyweight ~ age +
age2 + motorized recreation + non-motorized recreation
+ (1|year) (σ2 year: 5.27
(± 2.30) total variance explained: 30%); Control variables: density red
deer (t-3 and t0) available habitat mean
annual precipitation and mean annual temperature were dropped during
model selection and did not affect pregnancy rates and bodyweight. |
a Pregnancy rate ~ sqrt(age) +
bodyweight + motorized recreation + non-motorized recreation (the
predictors of the pregnancy rate model cause a 24% reduction in the
absolute value of the log-likelihood parameter); b
beta’s of continuous independent variables are standardized;
c * = p < 0.05 ** = p < 0.01 *** =
p < 0.001; d Reference value = presence;
e Bodyweight ~ age +
age2 + motorized recreation + non-motorized recreation
+ (1|year) (σ2 year:
5.27 (± 2.30) total variance explained: 30%); Control variables:
density red deer (t-3 and t0) available
habitat mean annual precipitation and mean annual temperature were
dropped during model selection and did not affect pregnancy rates and
bodyweight. |
a Pregnancy rate ~
sqrt(age) + bodyweight + motorized recreation + non-motorized recreation
(the predictors of the pregnancy rate model cause a 24% reduction in
the absolute value of the log-likelihood parameter); b
beta’s of continuous independent variables are standardized;
c * = p < 0.05 ** = p < 0.01 *** =
p < 0.001; d Reference value = presence;
e Bodyweight ~ age +
age2 + motorized recreation + non-motorized recreation
+ (1|year) (σ2 year: 5.27
(± 2.30) total variance explained: 30%); Control variables: density red
deer (t-3 and t0) available habitat mean
annual precipitation and mean annual temperature were dropped during
model selection and did not affect pregnancy rates and
bodyweight. |