1.4 Conclusion
From the findings on Greater Kudu dispersal in the study area,
spatio-temporal changes of Greater Kudu population density was evident
thus the null hypothesis that spatio-temporal distribution of dispersal
areas of the Greater Kudu in Lake Bogoria landscape did not change in
the last four years was rejected. It was recommended that factors
contributing to changes in dispersal of Greater Kudu be assessed for
enhanced conservation and by extension improved livelihoods in LBNR,
Baringo County.
It was also observed that transect lines established in the year 2019 by
Friends of Nature Bogoria with the aim conduct annual Kudu population
counts are under-utilized. It was recommended that anthropogenic
activities contributing to Greater Kudu habitat degradation be curbed by
providing alternative livelihood sources, and enhancement of adoption of
sustainable technologies including use of solar energy and climate-smart
agriculture by the local communities.