Abstract
Latitudinal diversity gradients are among the most studied macroecological phenomena. However, they tend to be described using large composite datasets that often show taxonomic and geographic sampling bias. Here we describe a latitudinal gradient in marine bivalve diversity along the eastern coastline of Australia, spanning 2,667 km of coastline and 20° of latitude. We utilise a large, structured field dataset (5,670 individuals) in conjunction with a routine macroecological dataset downloaded from the Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS: 6,226 specimens). Diversity is estimated using a series of analytical methods to account for undersampling, and biogeographic gradients in taxonomic composition are quantified and compared to existing biogeographical schemes. A strong latitudinal gradient is present in both datasets. However, the strength of the gradient depends on the dataset and analytical method used. The inclusion of observational data in the macroecological dataset obscures any latitudinal pattern. The documented biogeographic gradients are consistent with global and regional reconstructions. However, we find evidence for a strong transition zone between two clusters. Although latitudinal gradients inferred from large macroecological datasets such as OBIS can match those inferred from field data, care should be taken when curating downloaded data as small changes in protocols can generate very different results. By contrast, even modest regional field datasets can readily reconstruct latitudinal patterns.